Select the search type
  • Site
  • Web
Search

Search Results

Why Your AI Agent Fails 97.5% of Real Work — And the Fix Isn't More Code

Published on AgileAIDev.com | By Rod Claar, CST & Principal Consultant

Rod Claar 0 932 Article rating: No rating

Most AI agent projects fail not because of bad code or weak models — they fail because teams aim at the wrong part of the workflow. AI strategist Nate B. Jones argues that real work is only about 2.5% high-judgment "core" decisions, while the other 97.5% is mechanical edge work: data prep, QA, synthesis, handoffs, and packaging. Teams that try to automate the core first stall out fast. Teams that start with the edges — the boring stuff surrounding the valuable work — ship results in days, build organizational trust, and create a proven path toward eventually tackling the core. It's the same principle behind Agile: start small, deliver value fast, and expand from a foundation of demonstrated success. The fix isn't better AI. It's smarter strategy about where you start.

RSS

Article Search

Categories

Calendar

«April 2026»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
1213141516
1718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789

Upcoming events Events RSSiCalendar export