Select the search type
  • Site
  • Web
Search

Free Learning Enrollment

Get curated free lessons
tailored to your interests

Pick your topics and we’ll open your default email client with a prefilled enrollment request to rodclaar@effectiveagiledev.com.

  • Role-aware learning: Scrum, dev languages, web, DNN, AI tools & local LLMs.
  • Fast start: we’ll reply with links, playlists, and recommended next steps.
  • Self-contained module: all styling and logic is in this one block.

Enroll me in free learning

Opens your default email client (mailto). If you don’t have a mail app configured, use a webmail handler (Gmail/Outlook) or copy/paste the info into an email to rodclaar@effectiveagiledev.com.

Search Results

The Top 5 AI Changes Hitting Software Development for the Week of April 27, 2026

This week was not about autocomplete. It was about AI moving deeper into the real work of software delivery. Or was it?

Rod Claar 0 37 Article rating: No rating

The article argues that recent AI advances are moving software development from simple code completion to agent-driven delivery. AI tools are now better at planning, editing code, testing, debugging, reviewing, and creating pull requests across larger codebases.

The five main changes are:

  1. AI coding agents are handling more complex engineering work, which means teams need clearer backlog items, acceptance criteria, constraints, and tests.
  2. AI agents are entering enterprise infrastructure, so organizations must create rules for repo access, data use, security, compliance, and human review.
  3. IDEs are becoming control rooms for remote agents, shifting developers toward task delegation, review, and decision-making rather than writing every line of code themselves.
  4. AI coding cost is becoming part of planning, as usage-based billing makes agent activity a budget concern.
  5. New research shows AI agents are powerful but risky, with generated code often needing correction and potentially introducing security issues.

The central message is that Scrum and Agile practices become more important, not less. Teams that succeed will use AI deliberately, with tight feedback loops, visible acceptance criteria, strong review practices, automated tests, and clear working agreements.

Why Your AI Agent Fails 97.5% of Real Work — And the Fix Isn't More Code

Published on AgileAIDev.com | By Rod Claar, CST & Principal Consultant

Rod Claar 0 949 Article rating: No rating

Most AI agent projects fail not because of bad code or weak models — they fail because teams aim at the wrong part of the workflow. AI strategist Nate B. Jones argues that real work is only about 2.5% high-judgment "core" decisions, while the other 97.5% is mechanical edge work: data prep, QA, synthesis, handoffs, and packaging. Teams that try to automate the core first stall out fast. Teams that start with the edges — the boring stuff surrounding the valuable work — ship results in days, build organizational trust, and create a proven path toward eventually tackling the core. It's the same principle behind Agile: start small, deliver value fast, and expand from a foundation of demonstrated success. The fix isn't better AI. It's smarter strategy about where you start.

RSS

Search

Next steps

Choose your next step — Learn, Courses, or Videos.

Not sure where you came from? No problem. Pick the destination that matches what you want to do next.

Tip: If you want a guided starting point, choose Learn. If you want dates and registration, choose Courses. If you want quick wins, choose Videos.